Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
0.1.18
|
Minor bugfixes |
14-Jul-2004 19:49 |
|
0.1.17
|
Minor feature enhancements |
07-Dec-2002 22:05 |
|
0.1.15
|
Major feature enhancements |
29-Oct-2002 09:54 |
|
0.1.14
|
Code cleanup |
03-Jul-2002 17:06 |
|
0.1.13
|
Minor bugfixes |
26-Apr-2002 11:11 |
|
0.1.12
|
Minor bugfixes |
12-Feb-2002 20:13 |
|
0.1.11
|
Minor feature enhancements |
21-Dec-2001 18:26 |
|
0.1.10
|
Minor bugfixes |
19-Nov-2001 16:32 |
|
0.1.9
|
Major feature enhancements |
16-Sep-2001 16:19 |
|
0.1.8
|
Minor bugfixes |
24-Aug-2001 19:39 |
Comments
[»]
runs fine - at least on the unix side
by jlennon - Oct 4th 2002 05:59:30
The unix client part of dbtcp runs really nice. We're using the Perl module
in order to import some data from a proprietary database into MySQL.
However, there are a few hassles on the Windows side, but I don't think
they are caused by dbtcp.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Is it possible to make dbtcp link_identifier being used by multiple users?
by devin - Jul 28th 2002 21:39:06
Hi,
DBTCP server is working very well on Windows box.
we are wrting an web-based application on linux in
PHP accessing data held on Windows, this
application is using a link_identifier returned by
dbtcp_connect(). If just one user is using this link_id,
dbtcp functions are working very well, but if multiple
users are using this link_id at the same time, It will
not work.
I am not sure it is the problem with php code or the
problem with dbtcp functions.
Regards
devin
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Works just fine!
by kfn - Nov 7th 2001 12:02:43
The program is running on on NT4, and RH6.1.
It is fast and works just fine. It is a little complicated to read the
source files, all the comments is in Italian.
Good Job!
-- /* kfn */
[reply]
[top]
[»]
It works!
by rgibons - Oct 23rd 2001 12:04:47
Tried it to connect to MS SQL 2000 databases and
everything worked as advertised. It was fast and
easy. My only wish is that the windows program
could run as a service so I don't have to have a
user logged in on the Windows 2000 server all the
time.
[reply]
[top]
|