Branches
Comments
[»]
Been using Plans for years, on various websites.
by Mirz - Jun 8th 2007 13:21:55
It's a simple, easy-to-use, calendar. It's a breeze to install and works
right out of the box. Customization is easy. I have tried many other
calendar programs, some with less features, some with more. I always come
back to Plans for reliability. It's user-friendliness is a plus for my
staff who like to do things quickly. And for the price...? Who can beat it.
--
My sites: Bitmapworld.com - Scriptmonkeys.us
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Work with speedycgi?
by happyman - Sep 28th 2005 19:43:56
Plans looks good and pretty. However, when it comes to perl cgi, I would
like it run faster.
Anybody make it work with speedycgi?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Work with speedycgi?
by Lloyd Dalton - Oct 9th 2005 20:58:28
Not at the present time. Feel free to add this request to the development
wiki.
> Plans looks good and pretty. However,
> when it comes to perl cgi, I would like
> it run faster.
> Anybody make it work with speedycgi?
>
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Splendid.
by NoseyNick - Apr 27th 2005 10:53:51
Does the job, does it well. A few particularly neat features like being
able to include plans calendars from other sites, nicely templatable, all
sorts of neat config options (it is WELL worth reading your
plans_config.pl). Some other calendars LOOK prettier but start to look
uglier when you actually use them, Plans looks neat and gets even neater
when you actually use it.
Wouldn't mind a few more import options. I might write some.
--
Nick Waterman. Senior Systems Administrator
mailto:fmsig@noseynick.net http://noseynick.net/
[reply]
[top]
[»]
yet another bump
by phrawzty - Jan 27th 2005 14:37:32
I hate to just add another "mee too!" comment, but this really is a
high-quality project, especially given the price point. There's nothing
about it that will make your jaw drop; it does what it advertises, and it
does it flawlessly. In the end, isn't that what you really want anyways?
:)
--
.---phrawzty----'
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Plans: exactly what I needed
by Beth - Dec 17th 2004 08:13:27
Plans is a reasonble, easy to use *FREE* calendar. For my scout troop and
keeping track of family events, it's exactly what I needed. Reading the
announcements for updates indicates that it's a little buggy--but those
bugs are constantly being fixed and don't interfere with day-to-day use.
For a *FREE* calendar, I couldn't ask for more--you get a lot more than you
pay for.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Access control
by AChan - Mar 21st 2004 20:55:18
A great web-based calendar. Any plans to include access control to limit
views of a calandar to a specific group ?
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Access control
by Lloyd Dalton - Jun 1st 2004 14:56:35
There are multiple ways to limit web access at the server level. I
think it's poor architecture to do it at the application level.
So no--there aren't immediate plans to add access control. For this to
change would require a case of demonstrated need.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Access control
by Spiney - May 4th 2005 10:36:21
I'm looking for an calendar application myself atm, and this one looks
great and would suit the requirements, but the lack of access controls is a
bit of a problem.
It's not so much general access control to the calendars (that's no
problem via a proper webserver configuration), but it would be nice to say
"User A has only read access, User B also write access". Or does this
feature exist and I missed it in the docs? (or am I supposed to configure
that via GET/POST Limits in the webserver configuration?)
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Access control
by Lloyd Dalton - Dec 9th 2005 07:11:47
> it would be nice to say "User A has only
> read access, User B also write access".
> Or does this feature exist and I missed
> it in the docs?
Not exactly. Plans does distinguish between calendar admins (who can
change calendar settings) and users (who can add/edit/delete events). But
this applies only to updating. There is no provision for allowing read
access on a per-user basis.
The "users" feature is turned off in the default install. It can be
turned on or off at any time.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Plans
by Jeff - Sep 5th 2002 09:06:49
I was looking for an easy solution to a need, little did I know I would
find a gem! Plans is as easy as it gets to manage as well as configure
and customize. If you're in the market for a calendar program that will
offer you more than just a html calendar - this is the one to get.
--
"There is no right way to do the wrong thing." Ghandi
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Plans
by ebell - Feb 15th 2007 15:40:29
I would have to totally agree! Plans has fit many a need for multiple
calendars.
> I was looking for an easy solution to a
> need, little did I know I would find a
> gem!Plans is as easy as it gets to
> manage as well as configure and
> customize.If you're in the market for a
> calendar program that will offer you
> more than just a html calendar - this is
> the one to get.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Best Perl/GPL Calendar available
by William McKee - Jul 3rd 2002 07:51:58
In my searches for a web-based calendar solution, Plans came out as the
best of breed. It has a great user-interface and features that make it easy
for my users to administer. Unlike most other web calendars, it properly
displays multi-day activities.
The calendar uses a well-documented CSS stylesheet to determine display
colors, fonts, etc. The only drawback is the lack of interface
customization because much of the layout is in Perl. Hopefully this
deficiency will change in future releases.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Best Perl/GPL Calendar available
by dhoover - Jul 25th 2002 00:35:41
> In my searches for a web-based calendar
> solution, Plans came out as the best of
> breed.
I have to agree, its simple... its perl.. it works, its well done.
[reply]
[top]
|
