 |
Spamato - Default branch
|
Section: Unix |
|
|
|
| Added: Fri, Aug 5th 2005 07:35 UTC (3 years, 1 month ago) |
Updated: Sun, Jan 7th 2007 17:57 UTC (1 year, 8 months ago) |
|
|
About:
Spamato is an extensible spam filter system. It is available as an add-on for Outlook, an extension for Thunderbird and Mozilla Mail, and a stand-alone proxy component. It provides a Bayesian filter, a rule-based filter, a Java implementation of Razor (Ephemeral and Whiplash), a filter that queries domains on Google, a collaborative domain, and a collaborative hash-based filter. Graphical statistics explain the efficiency of each filter as well as the overall effectiveness of the whole system.
Author:
kenoa [contact developer]
Homepage:
http://www.spamato.net/
CVS tree (cvsweb):
http://spamato.cvs.sourceforge.net/
Bug tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=136033&atid=734826
Trove categories:
[change]
Dependencies:
[change]
No dependencies filed
|
|
» Rating:
8.37/10.00
(Rank N/A)
» Vitality: 0.00% (Rank 10676)
» Popularity: 0.63% (Rank 9408)

(click to enlarge graphs)
Record hits: 5,562
URL hits: 1,969
Subscribers: 19
|
|
Branches
Comments
[»]
Interaction with Outlook Rules
by alrubin - Oct 2nd 2006 21:21:02
Hi,
How did you solve the problem with Outlook Rules interaction? They move
messages to folder in spite of the fact the message is spam. I'm a
developer of another outlook spam
filter Spam Reader and now we faced this problem. Any advises will be
appreciated.
Thanks!
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Interaction with Outlook Rules
by kenoa - Oct 3rd 2006 10:27:56
We haven't solved this problem. We just ignore automatically moved
messages. Our philosophy is that if a user creates a rule to move messages,
the messages are most likely ham, not spam. But of course, this does not
always count, so we definitely miss moved spam messages.
On the other hand, the user is able to define which folders to check. That
is, if the user moves all messages from the inbox to folder X, than the
user should mark folder X to be checked by Spamato as well.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Interaction with Outlook Rules
by alrubin - Oct 3rd 2006 22:23:05
Keno,
It's good idea to have a list of folders that should be checked for spam!
Currently we check only Inbox, so it definately makes sense.
Thank you!
[reply]
[top]
|
|
 |