 |
SpinPike Hosting Version - Default branch
|
Section: Unix |
|
|
|
| Added: Thu, Aug 18th 2005 05:51 UTC (3 years, 1 month ago) |
Updated: Thu, Aug 18th 2005 07:04 UTC (3 years, 1 month ago) |
|
|
About:
SpinPike Hosting Version is special CMS for
hosting companies and developers of Internet
solutions. Having the full functionality of all 21
SpinPike modules, it allows managing up to 50
sites through different administrative interfaces
using one engine. The program is distinguished by
a user friendly, completely browser based
interface, advanced publishing technology, and the
availability of image templates for quick creation
of image-rich sites.
Author:
SavvyBox [contact developer]
Homepage:
http://spinpike.com/en/content/products/hosting/
Changelog:
http://spinpike.com/en/content/support-en/change_log/
Trove categories:
[change]
Dependencies:
[change]
No dependencies filed
|
|
» Rating:
(not rated)
» Vitality: 0.00% (Rank 25523)
» Popularity: 0.14% (Rank 30136)

(click to enlarge graphs)
Record hits: 2,478
URL hits: 1,279
Subscribers: 1
|
|
Branches
Comments
[»]
hm... TYPO3?
by Michael Shigorin - Aug 18th 2005 08:06:12
Usual question, how does it stack against TYPO3 or say Drupal?
I've been only glad ever since discovering the former, great product by
decent people -- and nice community too.
-- Michael Shigorin
mike SOMEWHERE AT altlinux PLUS DOT org
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: hm... TYPO3?
by Victor_DH - Sep 6th 2005 06:47:33
hm...another usual question: how the supported cms with author's guaranty
is compared favorably to open-source?
The latter is free, but the first is reliable and doesn't bother you. if
you don't value your time and efforts - try open-source. As for me I'm
sick and tired of it.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: hm... TYPO3?
by Michael Shigorin - Sep 6th 2005 06:57:02
> hm...another usual question: how the
> supported cms with author's guaranty is
> compared favorably to open-source?
Please remember that you (ab)use site about free software to advertise
yourself before spreading FUD.
As for you not doing your homework, *go* to typo3.com and then *think*
whether you can provide *that* level of support.
You are simply going to have enough badmouthing all over Internet with
"facts" like that...
> The latter is free, but the first is
> reliable and doesn't bother you. if you
> don't value your time and efforts - try
> open-source. As for me I'm sick and
> tired of it.
Patrick, could you judge on this?
-- Michael Shigorin
mike SOMEWHERE AT altlinux PLUS DOT org
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: hm... TYPO3?
by Victor_DH - Sep 7th 2005 03:59:20
1. If you are taking PERSONAL OPINION as the abuse - so what for you put
the questions?
2. Don't mix me up in your marketing games! For this reason you can use
add and so on.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: hm... TYPO3?
by Michael Shigorin - Sep 7th 2005 04:46:53
> 1. If you are taking PERSONAL OPINION
> as the abuse - so what for you put the
> questions?
No, I've taken advertising some (inferior as far as I can see) non-free
product here as abuse. Thanks Daniel Pearson who's kindly pointed out that
it's compliant with intended use of freshmeat.
As FM staff is more in position to judge what's appropriate and what's
not, I'm only adding this link to Tom Lord's message for those
slightly surprised about the rise of proprietary waste here last years as a
possible explanation.
Re "personal opinion", hope those looking at this FM record will judge on
their own /which/ kind of abuse it is and whether they want to support such
an author with anything.
Please don't take it really up to heart, it wasn't intended as personal
offence -- at least sure not more than your reply to fairly innocent
question (I've asked it before to different CMS authors and got the correct
technical answers and not whining about something completely
abstract).
I'm writing (and reading) both free and proprietary software; so far the
latter tends to suck more bitterly than the former, JFYI.
> 2. Don't mix me up in your marketing
> games!
I don't have any marketing games [here], it's you who tries to have.
So: I've just asked the simple usual technical question, you can check my
comment history -- maybe there are previous like that still recorded (the
history has limited length).
I'm not affiliated with them but being interested in CMS area as a
user/developer, getting correct answers is needed to start looking at
something better than the last iteration's findings.
Last time I've changed major CMS was exactly due to research like this;
folks over here have liked it very much ever since, but there's no such
thing as perfect software so I occasionally re-check things just in case
(e.g. runner-up could have been developed better, you know).
Still I've got _two_ answers this time (yours and FM's) which is quite
generous for a single question.
> For this reason you can use add and so on.
Thanks, I've learned how to use "add" link a bit earlier than you
appeared here altogether; and good luck, maybe you learn something too.
-- Michael Shigorin
mike SOMEWHERE AT altlinux PLUS DOT org
[reply]
[top]
|
|
 |