|
About:
ORBit2 is a major revision to the ORBit code base,
adding the foundations of threading support, a
massively shrunk and genericised code base, and
lots more power, completeness, and correctness.
Release focus: N/A
Author:
Michael Meeks [contact developer]
Homepage:
http://www.gnome.org/projects/ORBit2/
Tar/GZ:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/ORBit2/2.14/
Tar/BZ2:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/ORBit2/2.14/
Changelog:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/ORBit2/2.14/ORBit2-2.14.10.news
Debian package:
http://packages.debian.org/orbit2
CVS tree (cvsweb):
http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/ORBit2/trunk/
Bug tracker:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/
Mailing list archive:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/orbit-list/
Trove categories:
[change]
Dependencies:
[change]
No dependencies filed
|
|
» Rating:
8.30/10.00
(Rank N/A)
» Vitality: 0.01% (Rank 5209)
» Popularity: 0.89% (Rank 6590)

(click to enlarge graphs)
Record hits: 6,389
URL hits: 3,874
Subscribers: 28
|
|
Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
2.14.10
|
Minor bugfixes |
31-Dec-2007 18:30 |
|
2.12.0
|
Minor bugfixes |
24-Dec-2004 19:22 |
|
2.5.0
|
N/A |
23-Oct-2002 16:38 |
|
2.4.3
|
N/A |
20-Sep-2002 23:27 |
Comments
[»]
Good Product, could be better
by mcoon - May 6th 2006 10:17:45
Decent sopport of the standard, Ok manuals, good community support. Could
be better. The main nit I have with large open source products like these
is that they tend to do fairly well on the technology, but not so well on
documentation. That being said, its not that bad.
The other nit is that this object oriented development system (the IDL is
OO) nominally generates plain old C code. Sure it supports C++ and others,
but only with a wrapper.
So here's a question for the community. When you are developing a code
generator for an IDL specifically designed with OO in mind, what language
is your first choice? Err... sorry, not that one. <sigh>.
Some time ago I switched my development from using Orbit to using ACE TAO.
What a CORBA environment should be. Only one problem, while it is indeed a
better product with an OSI approved liscense, it is in reality an open
source initiative looking to generate $$ from its users (seems the only way
to get decent docs, or in fact any docs, is to pay ~$400 USD). So, back to
the only game in town... Orbit.
[reply]
[top]
|