About:
The Openwall Linux kernel patch is a collection of security "hardening" features for the Linux kernel. In addition to the new features, some versions of the patch contain various security fixes. The "hardening" features of the patch, while not a complete method of protection, provide an extra layer of security against the easier ways to exploit certain classes of vulnerabilities and/or reduce the impact of those vulnerabilities. The patch can also add a little bit more privacy to the system by restricting access to parts of /proc so that users may not see what others are doing.

Release focus: Minor feature enhancements

Changes:
This release has been updated to Linux 2.2.26. Additionally, the reporting of returns onto the stack has been made more verbose.

Author:
Solar Designer [contact developer]

Rating:	reset 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8.39/10.00 (9 votes)

Homepage:
http://www.openwall.com/linux/
Tar/GZ:
http://www.openwall.com/linux/linux-2.2.26-ow1.tar.gz
Mirror site:
http://www.openwall.com/mirrors/

Trove categories: [change]

[Development Status]		5 - Production/Stable
[Environment]		Console (Text Based)
[Intended Audience]		End Users/Desktop, System Administrators
[License]		OSI Approved :: GNU General Public License (GPL), OSI Approved :: GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL), Public Domain
[Operating System]		POSIX :: Linux
[Programming Language]		Assembly, C
[Topic]		Security, System :: Operating System Kernels :: Linux, System :: Systems Administration

Dependencies: [change]
Linux (2.2 branch) (required)
[download links]

 Branches

Branch	Version	Last release	License	URLs
Linux 2.4	2.4.35-ow2	14-Aug-2007	GNU General Public License (GPL)
Linux 2.0	2.0.40-ow1	17-Apr-2004	GNU General Public License (GPL)
Linux 2.2	2.2.26-ow1	01-Mar-2004	GNU General Public License (GPL)

 Releases

Version	Focus	Date
2.2.26-ow1	Minor feature enhancements	01-Mar-2004 04:40
2.2.25-ow2	Major security fixes	21-Feb-2004 15:14
2.2.25-ow1	Minor feature enhancements	20-Mar-2003 23:16
2.2.23-ow1	Minor feature enhancements	05-Dec-2002 12:46
2.2.22-ow2	Minor security fixes	30-Nov-2002 08:16
2.2.22-ow1	Minor feature enhancements	18-Sep-2002 04:27
2.2.21-ow2	Major security fixes	10-Sep-2002 09:22
2.2.21	Minor security fixes	27-May-2002 10:10
2.2.20-ow3	Minor bugfixes	04-Apr-2002 10:20
2.2.20-ow2	Minor security fixes	03-Mar-2002 21:29

 Comments

[»] How does it compares with security linux
by Veerakumar - Jun 4th 2005 20:06:12

How does it compares with NSA Security Linux patch. Anyone has a idea.

--
Visit me at Veera

[reply] [top]

[»] Re: How does it compares with security linux
by Solar Designer - Jun 5th 2005 18:20:21

These two are not even similar, so it is hard to compare them. Rather, I'll describe them briefly:

The Openwall Linux kernel patch - a collection of security "hardening" features aimed at reducing the likelihood and/or impact of successful exploitation of certain classes of vulnerabilities in userspace applications, without requiring modifications to any userspace applications or libraries; also included are security fixes/enhancements to issues with the kernel itself (whenever the mainstream kernel is being too conservative or too slow at fixing security issues).

NSA SELinux - adds support for mandatory access control policies into the Linux kernel, and provides patches to certain userspace utilities to make use of said Linux kernel additions, with more userspace patches available from third parties (the kernel patch is useless without userspace applications and libraries patches); no security fixes/enhancements to issues with the kernel itself are being included (as far as I'm aware).

The two kernel patches can co-exist, and it may make sense to use both approaches on some systems, although there may be some issues with patch merging (might have to apply some hunks manually). I have not tried that.

You could also want to consider RSBAC as a well-established generic alternative to SELinux. (Or rather, SELinux is an alternative to RSBAC, since RSBAC is an older project.) It can co-exist with the Openwall Linux kernel patch, too, and I know that some people and even Linux distributions (ALT Linux Castle, other minor ones) have been using these patches together.

[reply] [top]

---