|
About:
Spamato is an extensible spam filter system. It is available as an add-on for Outlook, an extension for Thunderbird and Mozilla Mail, and a stand-alone proxy component. It provides a Bayesian filter, a rule-based filter, a Java implementation of Razor (Ephemeral and Whiplash), a filter that queries domains on Google, a collaborative domain, and a collaborative hash-based filter. Graphical statistics explain the efficiency of each filter as well as the overall effectiveness of the whole system.
Release focus: Major bugfixes
Changes:
Several bugs and inconveniences were fixed. For instance, the "Move & Duplication" bug in Spamato4Thunderbird, the ".NET 2.0" bug in Spamato4Outlook, and the Gmail and POP account problems in Spamatoxy have been fixed.
Author:
kenoa [contact developer]
Homepage:
http://www.spamato.net/
CVS tree (cvsweb):
http://spamato.cvs.sourceforge.net/
Bug tracker:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=136033&atid=734826
Trove categories:
[change]
Dependencies:
[change]
No dependencies filed
|
|
» Rating:
8.37/10.00
(Rank N/A)
» Vitality: 0.00% (Rank 11077)
» Popularity: 0.64% (Rank 9393)

(click to enlarge graphs)
Record hits: 5,760
URL hits: 1,990
Subscribers: 19
|
|
Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
0.99.1
|
Major bugfixes |
08-Jan-2007 01:57 |
|
0.99
|
Major feature enhancements |
12-Jun-2006 17:44 |
|
0.98b
|
Minor feature enhancements |
17-Feb-2006 15:25 |
|
0.98
|
Minor feature enhancements |
08-Jan-2006 14:07 |
|
0.9
|
Initial freshmeat announcement |
05-Aug-2005 19:47 |
Comments
[»]
Interaction with Outlook Rules
by alrubin - Oct 2nd 2006 21:21:02
Hi,
How did you solve the problem with Outlook Rules interaction? They move
messages to folder in spite of the fact the message is spam. I'm a
developer of another outlook spam
filter Spam Reader and now we faced this problem. Any advises will be
appreciated.
Thanks!
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Interaction with Outlook Rules
by kenoa - Oct 3rd 2006 10:27:56
We haven't solved this problem. We just ignore automatically moved
messages. Our philosophy is that if a user creates a rule to move messages,
the messages are most likely ham, not spam. But of course, this does not
always count, so we definitely miss moved spam messages.
On the other hand, the user is able to define which folders to check. That
is, if the user moves all messages from the inbox to folder X, than the
user should mark folder X to be checked by Spamato as well.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: Interaction with Outlook Rules
by alrubin - Oct 3rd 2006 22:23:05
Keno,
It's good idea to have a list of folders that should be checked for spam!
Currently we check only Inbox, so it definately makes sense.
Thank you!
[reply]
[top]
|