Branches
Releases
|
Version
|
Focus
|
Date
|
|
3.1.9
|
Minor bugfixes |
07-Apr-2005 11:53 |
|
3.1.8
|
Minor bugfixes |
16-Jul-2004 18:40 |
|
3.1.6
|
Minor bugfixes |
12-Sep-2003 18:38 |
|
3.1.4
|
Minor bugfixes |
06-Jul-2002 10:18 |
|
3.1.3
|
Minor bugfixes |
01-Apr-2002 13:51 |
|
3.1.2
|
Major bugfixes |
28-Feb-2002 07:30 |
|
3.1.1
|
Minor bugfixes |
26-Dec-2001 14:20 |
|
3.1.0
|
Minor bugfixes |
23-Dec-2001 01:16 |
|
3.0.4
|
Minor bugfixes |
08-Nov-2001 03:56 |
|
3.0.3
|
Minor feature enhancements |
24-Apr-2001 16:23 |
Comments
[»]
resume transfer
by Andreas - Apr 15th 2003 16:26:13
the only thing I think ncftp need is the possibility to resume previous
downloads.
-- /Andreas
[reply]
[top]
[»]
lftp
by Walles - Aug 21st 2002 04:04:09
See also lftp. According
to my taste (but of course not necessarily yours) it is nicer to use than
ncftp, but for some reason not as well known. The feature set is basically
identical.
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: NCFTP 3.0
by naChoZ - Jun 16th 1999 17:50:10
Well, not only is background useful for things other than warez, NcFTP is
fully capable of bgput and bgget.
I'm not very happy with 3.0, myself. The last version was perfect, but
the new one blows. The bookmarking was less of a PITA, the interface was
nicer, command line options were available, etc...
-- Andy Harrison
ICQ: 123472 AIM/Y!: AHinMaine
[reply]
[top]
[»]
Re: NCFTP 3.0
by אני לא אומר! - Apr 18th 2001 09:18:06
> I'm not very happy with 3.0, myself.
> The last version was perfect, but the
> new one blows. The bookmarking was less
> of a PITA, the interface was nicer,
> command line options were available,
> etc...
I miss the command line options too.
The interface was changed because they decided to remove the ncurses
support, so people without ncurses can still compile ncftp. But,
they still provide the old ncurses-based bookmark editor as a seperate
program (ncftpbookmarks), and if you type "make install", ncftp will run
the old bookmark editor each time you type "bookmarks" or "open".
[reply]
[top]
|